Search This Blog

Sunday, October 21, 2007

Do super-Earths have geology suited to life?





Debate erupts over whether alien planets have active plate tectonics.


Artist illustration of a super Earth. Image credit: CfA. Click to enlarge.
Nearly all the extrasolar planets discovered have been Jupiter-sized or larger. But astronomers from the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics think that super-earths - rocky planets several times larger that our planet - might actually be much more common. Based on the recent discovery of a super-earth around a red dwarf star 9,000 light-years away, the research team calculated that there are probably 3 times as many of these planets than the larger gas giants.




The discovery in recent years of a handful of rocky planets orbiting stars outside the Solar System has scientists wondering whether those planets are as suitable as Earth for life. This month, two research groups have entered the debate by butting heads over whether active plate tectonics are likely on such planets.


The movement of tectonic plates, which on our own planet created the Himalayas and moved the continents to their current positions, is thought to be important for moderating a planet's temperature and recycling materials that may nourish life. But do 'super-Earths' - planets with a mass up to ten times greater than our planet that are solid, unlike the gas giants - have a similar geology to our home?


Diana Valencia, leading a group of scientists at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, says that tectonic plates are inevitible as rocky planets get bigger. As size increases, so does the amount of heat flowing up from the planet's radioactive core through the gooey mantle. This strikes the planet's crusty lid with increasing force, eventually breaking it into plates. A preprint of the paper is on Arxiv, and the paper has been accepted for publication in Astrophysical Journal Letters 1.


Valencia's logic follows from the limited trend available in the Solar System: Mars, Mercury and rocky moons lack plate tectonics. Venus, the second largest rocky planet, may have had active plates in the past. The biggest, Earth, is the only one with plate tectonics. "It might not be a coincidence," says Valencia.


Solid surface


But Earth might be an anomaly, and the trend might not extend to bigger rocky planets says Craig O'Neill, a planetary scientist at Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia.


O'Neill and his group have come to the exact opposite conclusion to Valencia. Their model, published in Geophysical Research Letters 2, shows that as a planet gets bigger, the increasing force of gravity squeezes crustal rocks together into a solid lid, making it more difficult for forces from below to crack it into plates.


A large, capped-lid planet could be like Venus, with a hellish atmosphere and runaway greenhouse effect. It could be cold and dead like Earth's Moon. Or, if fed by internal heat from the core, it could vent that heat through massive bouts of volcanism, as on Io, a moon of Jupiter. That doesn't necessarily rule out life, but it might make it difficult.


Far from home


Some scientists say both papers are premature. Science doesn't even understand plate tectonics on Earth, so it shouldn't be making predictions for other worlds, says Dave Stevenson, a planetary scientist at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena.


"Both papers are somewhat speculative and quite a long way removed from anything that's likely to be confirmed in the future with observation," says Stevenson. The models both neglect the crucial influence of water, which softens up and lubricates tectonic plates. They also make assumptions about parameters, such as the viscosity of the mantle or the strength of the crust, for which the values are unknown to within several orders of magnitude.


Researchers on both sides of the debate welcome critique, arguing that the community needs to grapple with these questions now.


Valencia points out that scientists need to prepare for planet-hunting projects such as NASA's Kepler and Terrestrial Planet Finder missions. One of her co-authors, Dimitar Sasselov, who is director of the Harvard University Origins of Life Initiative, says that five years ago, nobody cared about modelling tectonics on super-Earths. If his paper riles up other scientists, he says, "that makes me happy".




Technorati :

California plans to sue feds to enforce auto emissions law


24 hours newsSAN FRANCISCO -- California plans to sue the Bush administration next week to demand action on the state's request to restrict greenhouse emissions from cars and trucks.


Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's office says the state has waited too long for a decision from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.


California wants to start implementing a 2002 state law that limits auto emissions of carbon dioxide and other gases linked to global warming. But it needs EPA's approval because the statute is stricter than federal clean-air standards.


California requested federal permission to enforce the state law in December 2005.


California's auto emissions law is a model for similar statutes passed in 11 other states.



Another source :


Schwarzenegger's govt to sue Bush administration


It seems that Arnold Schwarzenegger's personality has not changed, but at least now he is fighting for a non-fictional good cause. Arnold Schwarzenegger has become the Governor of California and he seems to have taken real responsibility for his position. This way, after the state he governs has expected for about two years to receive a waiver from the Environment Protection Agency for allowing it to implement a tough state law that would crack down on the greenhouse gas emissions, Arnold Schwarzenegger has decided to sue the EPA in cour



SILICON VALLEY: California plans to sue the Bush administration to demand action on a long-stalled request to allow state government to limit auto emissions connected to global warming.


Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's office said that California had waited too long for a decision from the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the suit will be filed next week in a Washington, D.C., federal court.


The most prominent Republican governor suing the Bush administration sends a powerful message, which I hope will influence Congress," California Attorney General Jerry Brown said.


In December 2005, the state asked the EPA for permission to enforce the new California vehicle emission law, which served as model for similar laws in 11 other states. California needs the EPA approval to implement the new law because it is more stringent than federal clean-air standards.


California, which leads the nation in environmental issues, sees tough vehicle emission laws as a major part of the solution to global warming.


The California Air Resources Board estimates the new law would cut exhaust emissions in cars and light trucks by 25 per cent and in larger trucks and SUVs by 18 per cent.


Under the new rules, California would require automakers to use better air conditioners, more efficient transmissions and smaller engines.


The EPA held a public hearing in May and has promised a decision by the end of the year. But California said it has run out of patience and will go to court Wednesday, the deadline that Schwarzenegger set in April.


Major environmental groups are supporting the state in defense of its law and have also served notice on the EPA.




Pre Related


California Governor Gray Davis Signs Landmark Law Designed to Cut Car Exhaust Emissions



California Governor Gray Davis signed a landmark bill into law on July 22, 2002 designed to cut car exhaust emissions. The new law is the nation's first to require automakers to limit emissions of greenhouse gases, principally carbon dioxide, in an effort to curb global warming. The California law takes advantage of a unique loophole that allows the state to set its own air quality standards independent of the federal government.


The law requires the California Air Resources Board to obtain the "maximum feasible" cuts in greenhouse gases emitted by all non-commercial vehicles (cars as well as light-duty trucks and sport utility vehicles) in model year 2009 and beyond. The standards will apply to automakers' fleet averages, rather than each individual vehicle, and carmakers will be able to partially achieve the standards by reducing pollution from non-auto sources (e.g. factories, etc.). The regulations would not take effect until January 1, 2006, but give automakers until 2009 to come up with technological changes or modifications to comply with the new standards.


"This is the first law in America to substantively address the greatest environmental challenge of the 21st century," Davis said. "In time, every state - and hopefully every country - will act to protect future generations from the threat of global warming. For California, that time is now."


This law opens a new chapter in the long history of the confrontation between California and carmakers, reminiscent of the tussle that started in the early 1990s over the state's insistence that the industry had to sell a set number of "zero-emission" cars yearly in the state or face exclusion from the market's biggest market.


With legal challenges pending, that project is still sputtering along, although it has been substantially watered down after the authorities were persuaded that battery development - the only practical zero-emissions technology - was and remained far from a realistic option. Legal challenges are pending.


Auto industry interest groups claim it would not be practicable to build a special line of vehicles tailored to emissions standards currently exclusive to California, without sharply raising prices. This argument, as with the early stance against battery cars, remains to be proved. Auto industry lobbyists, who strongly oppose the California law, calling it "hush money" to the environmental movement and saying it will do little to decrease global warming while mandating expensive technological innovations that will deprive Californians of the big cars and trucks they love, have vowed to challenge it in federal court by invoking federal laws that reserve for Congress the power to set fuel economy standards.


"Federal law and common sense prohibit each state from developing its own fuel economy standards," Josephine Cooper, President of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, said in a statement this week. "We expect to challenge successfully the implementation of this law in federal court." William Fay, president of the American Highway Users Alliance, a driver advocacy group, said in a statement, Gov. Davis has triggered government fiat that will curtail every Californian's right to choose the safest and most appropriate vehicle for themselves and their families.


Davis said the auto industry was wrong to fight the measure, which he called a "historic step." He said, "The technology is available. It's affordable. And it's widely utilized in other countries. We're merely asking business to do what business does best: innovate, compete, find solutions to problems and do it in a way that strengthens the economy."


"Opponents of this bill say the sky is falling," the Governor continued. "But they said it about unleaded gasoline. They said it about catalytic converters. They said it about seat belts and air bags. But the sky is not falling. It's just getting a whole lot cleaner."






Technorati : ,

First Malaysian


First Malaysian


First Malaysian in space returns to Earth



Two Russian cosmonauts and the first Malaysian in space returned to Earth on Sunday after leaving the orbiting International Space Station, Russian mission control said.



The Soyuz craft with Shaikh Muszaphar Shukor, who carried out experiments for Malaysia's Genome Institute, and Russians Yuri Yurtshikin and Oleg Kotov touched down on the Kazakh steppe at 1043 GMT, it said.


The Malaysian astronaut, whose trip was paid for by the Malaysian government, left on the mission on October 10 with American Peggy Whitson, the new commander on the space station, and a Russian Yuri Malenchenko.


The capsule landed around 200 kilometres (120 miles) away from where was initially supposed to in Kazakhstan after its trajectory was altered after it entered the Earth's atmosphere, ITAR-TASS reported.


They were taken out of the capsule several minutes after landing and were given a routine medical check. They were due to go by helicopter to the nearest airport to be taken to Moscow.


The temperature on the ground was a chilly six degrees Celsius (43 degrees Fahrenheit) and the men were given hot tea and were laid out on warming mats.


The three 'feel good,' a mission control official said on television channel Vesti.


The decision to include a Malasian in a space mission was made four years ago, when Russia landed a multi-billion dollar order to supply Malaysia with 18 Sukhoi 30 fighter jets.


A practising Muslim, the Malaysian celebrated the end of the holy month of Ramadan aboard the ISS.


Among other experiments, Muszaphar examined the impact of microgravitation on the coordination of eye and head movements and the evolution of cancerous cells in weightless conditions.


Yurtshikin and Kotov had both spent six months aboard the space station.





Technorati :

LHC ( Large Hadron Collider) : Particle collider is on schedule... just


The Large Hadron Collider, a 27-kilometre accelerator, is due to start operation in July 2008




CERN's new machine still aiming for 2008 debut.

Rumours of construction delays at the world's largest particle accelerator have exaggerated the size of the problem, according to the project's head. "There have been no show stoppers," wrote Robert Aymar, director-general of CERN, the particle physics lab near Geneva, Switzerland, in the 8 October issue of the lab's CERN Bulletin. "We can all look forward to the LHC producing its first physics in 2008."


His reassuring announcement came after gossip on physics blogs of new problems that could set the lab's Large Hadron Collider (LHC) even further behind its already delayed start date. But for all the reassurance, the LHC schedule remains tight, says project leader Lyn Evans. Relatively small mishaps could push the opening back beyond July 2008, when the LHC is supposed to start doing physics.


The machine is a CHF10-billion (US$8.4-billion) accelerator designed to slam protons into each other at energies of up to 14 teraelectronvolts - 7 times the current record. Detectors will comb through the debris from the collisions for evidence of the Higgs mechanism, which is believed to endow all other particles with mass, and for signs of physics beyond the 'standard model', the current theoretical framework of particle physics.


LHC construction has already faced a number of setbacks and delays. For example, in March, a support holding a superconducting magnet in one section of the machine failed, leaving engineers scrambling for a fix (see Nature doi:10.1038/news070402-3 ; 2007).


The latest round of speculation was sparked in September when engineers found that several pieces of tubing between magnets had crumpled as the machine was being prepared for servicing. Just six out of 424 sections collapsed, according to Raymond Veness, who leads the LHC's vacuum engineering team. But the failures blocked the beam line, along which particles will eventually travel. "This is a potentially nasty problem," Veness says.


For the time being, engineers have improvised a solution. Using compressed air, they are firing a small plastic ball equipped with a radio-transmitter through the line. By detecting where the ball comes to a halt, they have been able to spot collapsed sections in a matter of minutes. But changing the defective sections, a half-day task, adds to an already full maintenance schedule. "Everyone is stretched in all directions," adds Veness.


"I don't think anyone sees it as an insurmountable problem," says Peter Limon, a high-energy physicist at Fermilab in Batavia, Illinois, the only other lab currently working with very high-energy protons. But whether the July date can be met will depend on how the magnet systems behave in additional tests this winter, says Evans. A magnet or other component failure in a section of the ring cooled to liquid helium temperatures for testing could set things back by months because of the time needed to warm the section up for repairs and cool it back down.


"The next three months are going to be pretty critical," says Evans. "If something unforeseen comes up between now and then, it will slip. There's no doubt."



Recent
Some related news links :


Next-Gen Particle Collider's Slick New Sales Brochure


Supercomputer, Eh?


LHC at home in London


Cern computing project moves to London


You too can do particle physics




Technorati :

Technology alone won't


Technology alone won't


Technology alone won't tame climate-change juggernaut


California is on the cutting edge of America's efforts to reverse climate change, right? And the Bay Area is on the cutting edge of California, right?


Then why are we building like it's 1957, and the best thing we can think of is driving on the freeway? Maybe this is what makes it different: Now we can drive hybrids on the freeway.


Guess we're on the cutting edge, after all.


We all know that if we want to keep our climate, and our planet, relatively unscathed by climate change, we need to drastically reduce greenhouse gas pollution. Last year, California - in an act that really was on the cutting edge - passed the Global Warming Solutions Act to reduce the state's total greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020. That's an ambitious goal.


Now we have to get there.


The clear first step is to tackle transportation: All those cars and trucks belching out carbon dioxide and other pollutants. Transportation accounts for almost half of all the greenhouse gas emissions in the Bay Area and statewide.


There are two main ways to reduce emissions from transportation. We can use an example to illustrate each approach. Let's imagine a guy named Dan who lives in Dublin and drives a big sport utility vehicle to work at a high-tech company in Mountain View every day. It's a three-hour round trip and costs him at least $60 a week on gas - just for the commute. Dan would like to lower his impact on the climate (and maybe save some money on gas).


Here's his first option: He could buy a hybrid car with much better gas mileage. He'd save about $45 a week on gas, and he'd reduce his greenhouse gas emissions by two-thirds. Not bad.


Here's the second option: Dan could move to Mountain View and have only a three-mile round-trip commute. Even if he kept driving his truck to work, he only would spend $3 per week on gas for the commute, and he'd reduce his greenhouse gas emissions by almost 90 percent.


The upshot? Dan could do more for the climate (and his wallet) by moving himself and his gas guzzler close to his job than by getting a hybrid car for his long commute.


Of course, it's no small task to up and move. There's a lot to take into account. The thing is, Dan would save more than greenhouse gases and money on gas - he'd save that most precious of commodities, time. He'd have at least 10 hours more a week if he lived a few miles from work. He could spend that time with his wife and kids, or could play basketball after work, or run errands that he now does on the weekend. If he were really ambitious, maybe he could even bike to work - that would still save time, and he'd be a lot healthier. (It's hard to exercise much when your commute takes so long that you all you have time to do is eat, put the kids to bed, and sack out every night, before getting up to get on the road all over again.)


But maybe - and this is probably the case - Dan lives in Dublin because he can't afford to live in Mountain View. That illustrates why affordable housing is truly an environmental issue; when people can't afford to live close to their jobs, they end up driving long distances and pumping more carbon dioxide into the air.


So if Dan is committed to reducing his impact on the climate, he might well do both: Get a hybrid and move close to work, too (if he can afford it).


That's the equivalent of what California will need to do.


Dan's options illustrate the two ways to reduce emissions from transportation: increasing fuel economy and using low-carbon fuels ("technology"); and decreasing the number of miles driven ("travel").


Technological improvements are important. We have to reduce the amount of pollution released by the average car. California is again leading the way on this, with AB1493. The bill, which will take effect next fall (pending an automaker lawsuit and a waiver from the Environmental Protection Agency), will require reductions in vehicle emissions. By 2020, it will eliminate about a fifth of the greenhouse gases created by cars and trucks. That's a big step.


But technology isn't enough. Even with the new vehicle-emissions law, California's total emissions from transportation in 2020 are projected to be 6 percent higher - not lower - than they are today. This is because the number of miles we drive will increase. Here in the Bay Area, it's predicted that for every 4 miles we drive now, we'll be driving 5 in 2020.


Our cars will be more fuel-efficient, but we'll be driving them more. So we'll be right back at square one - or really, square negative one - because the impacts of our travel will probably have overwhelmed the benefits of our technology.


We need to do a lot more if we're actually going to reduce our emissions. We've got to reduce the amount we drive.


To do that, we need to build in a way that makes it easy to get around. We need to build more homes near jobs, and make sure people can afford those homes. We need to build neighborhoods with shops, services, good public transit, and parks - all within easy walking distance of homes.


It might seem like it's too late to talk about building so we don't have to drive as much. Our cities are already built, aren't they? Well, recent studies have estimated that half of all development that will be around in 2030 hasn't been built yet. There's still time. We can still choose how development should look.


This being the Bay Area, it's no surprise that we're making headway on the technology front in fighting global warming. Google and other tech firms have made big investments in plug-in hybrid cars, and more and more people are buying Priuses or even converting their cars to biodiesel. Technological innovations are at the heart of the Bay Area's culture and economy. We are experts at thinking outside the box and dreaming big - not building a better CD player, but instead rethinking the whole way we purchase and listen to music.


But when it comes to the other side of the equation - just driving less - it's like we're still using 8-track tapes in an iPod world. Why are we still building as if it's the 1950s, and we think strip malls, subdivisions and freeways are symbols of the good life?


It's time to turn the Bay Area's innovative talent to the question of how to use our land well. Instead of saying, "We have to drive, but maybe we should drive a different kind of car," let's ask, "How can we make it easier to get where we want to go?" Let's envision a better way to live for people and the planet, and let's start making it happen.


The Bay Area really can be on the cutting edge. But we have to act fast. When it comes to the climate, we don't have time to waste. Global climate change is going to take all the solutions we can provide. If we want to keep our region and our planet habitable - if we want to stop the climate juggernaut - we can't rely on technology alone. We need to do everything we know will work now.


We know it'll work to drive less. Let's build our cities to make it possible.


Tom Steinbach is the former executive director and Mike Howe is the interim director of Greenbelt Alliance, which promotes the protection of open space in the Bay Area and advocates for building homes in established urban areas. Contact them at www.greenbelt.org. Contact us at insight@sfchronicle.com.





Technorati : , ,

Shuttle mission Update


Shuttle Mission UpdateThe Discovery crew, from left: Col. Pamela A. Melroy, Col. George D. Zamka, Scott E. Parazynski, Stephanie D. Wilson, Col. Douglas H. Wheelock, Paolo A. Nespoli and Daniel M. Tani.




Amid Concerns, an Ambitious Shuttle Mission


Countdown :NASA Watches Weather for Tuesday Shuttl...


Astronauts ready for 'enormous challenge'


Mission Discovery: Space Shuttle Commander, Pilot Ready to Fly


Discovery's female-led crew consists of 6 Americans, 1 Italian






Technorati :

Iran's chief nuclear negotiator resigns


24hoursnews


Ali Larijani played a key role this year in defusing a crisis that erupted when Iranians seized a group of British sailors and Marines in disputed Persian Gulf waters off southern Iraq. .


TEHRAN -- Iran's chief nuclear negotiator, a relative moderate who struggled against the uncompromising agenda of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has resigned his high-profile post, government officials announced Saturday.

The resignation of Ali Larijani dealt a major setback to Iranian moderates trying to forge a compromise over Iran's pursuit of nuclear technology, which is strongly opposed by the West.


For two years, Larijani had served as secretary of the powerful Supreme National Security Council, which advises the highest levels of the government. His withdrawal "may make negotiations even more problematic than in recent months," said Patrick Cronin, a nuclear nonproliferation expert at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, a British think tank.

Larijani, a confidant to supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, is said to oppose Iran's isolation over its insistence on continuing its uranium enrichment program. Insiders said he advocated cutting a deal with the West to end the dispute, which has led to two sets of economic sanctions against Iran.

Within the inner leadership circle, Larijani was often at odds with Ahmadinejad, who refused to tone down his rhetoric or steer a more moderate course on the nation's nuclear ambitions.

"The difference between Ali Larijani and President Ahmadinejad was on the cost of the nuclear issue," said a Larijani advisor, who spoke on condition of anonymity. "Ahmadinejad insists on not any inch of compromise."

Word of the resignation came a few days after Russian President Vladimir V. Putin visited Tehran and proposed a deal to end the stalemate, and just before Larijani was to have discussed the issue with the European Union's foreign policy chief, Javier Solana.

"We will consider what you said and your proposal," Khamenei told Putin, according to the official IRNA news agency. "We are determined to satisfy the needs of the country in nuclear energy, and it is for this that we take seriously the question of enrichment."

Analysts said the resignation probably meant that Iran's leadership had opted to reject Putin's proposal, which most observers say was a deal in which Iran would halt its enrichment program in exchange for concessions from the West.

"Mr. Ali Larijani believed in a sort of compromise on uranium enrichment, but President Ahmadinejad thinks that Iran should go ahead with the current uranium enrichment and current nuclear policy," said Sadegh Zibakalam, a professor of political science at Tehran University. "Therefore, Mr. Ali Larijani had no option but to resign."

Enriched uranium can be used to power electricity plants or, if highly concentrated, become explosive material for an atomic bomb.

President Bush has said Iran should not have the know-how to create such a weapon. The United Nations Security Council has demanded that Iran halt enrichment until questions about its past nuclear activities are cleared up.

The West, led by the U.S., accuses Iran of using a legal nuclear energy program to mask an illegal pursuit of nuclear weapons technologies. Iran says its program is only for generating electricity.

Reacting to the resignation, White House spokeswoman Eryn Witcher said, "We seek a diplomatic solution to the issue of Iran's nuclear program and hope that whomever has this position will help lead Iran down a path of compliance with their U.N. Security Council obligations."

Larijani had tried before to tender his resignation.

"Larijani had resigned several times, and President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad finally accepted his resignation," government spokesman Gholamhossein Elham said Saturday, according to IRNA .

Elham downplayed the resignation, saying that Iran's policies would not change and that Larijani resigned for personal reasons to pursue other political activities. But a former advisor to the Iranian government on the nuclear issue said that "the gap between him and Ahmadinejad had reached a point that he simply had to resign."

Larijani has long been considered a relatively moderate voice. In 2005 he pushed for a two-year suspension of Iran's enrichment program, and this year he played a key role in defusing the crisis that erupted when Iranians seized a group of British sailors and marines in disputed Persian Gulf waters.

Diplomats say Larijani had a fruitful line of communication with Solana, the EU point person on Iran's nuclear issue.

The Fars News Agency reported that Saeed Jalili, deputy foreign minister for European and U.S. affairs, would fill the post for now and attend the Tuesday meeting with Solana in Italy.

"I think this is a very risky move that lightens Iran's diplomatic clout -- because for one thing, Jalili is too young and inexperienced to handle this big job, which means he will be at the president's beckoning," the former government advisor said, describing Ahmadinejad as "equally a novice on nuclear diplomacy."

Elham said Larijani might join the delegation. A Supreme National Security Council official said the post would be permanently filled within days.

Some analysts pointed out that style rather than substance characterized the differences between the two camps on the nuclear issue.

"Larijani was not advocating making major nuclear compromises, but he appreciated the need to retain constructive dialogue with the EU and felt Ahmadinejad needlessly undermined Iran's case with his blusterous rhetoric," said Karim Sadjadpour, an Iran expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a Washington think tank.

Replacing Larijani with Jalili buys Iran more time to pursue its ultimate goal of becoming a nuclear power, said Saeed Leylaz, an Iranian analyst and economist.

"The Islamic Republic of Iran is in a race against time with the West," Leylaz said. "All in all, Iran is going toward more radicalization and full nuclear power."


SOURCE : http://www.latimes.com




Technorati :

China blocks Google sites during congress,


China Blocks YouTube, Restores Flickr and Blogspot
China's Web viewers can no longer access YouTube, but Blogspot.com and Flickr photos are now available.


Local access to Google Inc.'s Chinese Web site was disrupted during an important meeting of the country's Communist Party leadership this week, leading to an accusation that service was purposely disabled by the government.
A Google spokesman confirmed that access to Google.cn was disrupted recently, but said service has since been restored.
According to a report Friday from the group Reporters Without Borders, access to Google's blog search and YouTube video-sharing services was disrupted during the Party's week-long congress, as a means of limiting the public's access to information about the event.
China's Communist Party holds its week-long congress every five years to choose leaders and set the party's agenda.
Users attempting to access Google's (GOOG:google inc cl a
News, chart, profile, more
Last: 644.71+5.09+0.80%


4:00pm 10/19/2007


Delayed quote dataAdd to portfolio
Analyst
Create alertInsider
Discuss
Financials
Sponsored by:


GOOG 644.71, +5.09, +0.8%) blog search service have been automatically redirected to Chinese search engine Baidu.com (BIDU:baidu com inc spon adr rep a
News, chart, profile, more
Last: 316.11-3.89-1.22%


4:00pm 10/19/2007


Delayed quote dataAdd to portfolio
Analyst
Create alertInsider
Discuss
Financials
Sponsored by:
BIDU 316.11, -3.89, -1.2%) since the congress began Oct. 15, the Reporter Without Borders report said.
Meanwhile, users attempting to access YouTube, which enables the spontaneous posting of homemade video clips, have been denied access, the report said.
"The blocking of these sites comes at a perfect time for the government," the Reporters Without Borders report said. "Blogs and video-sharing sites such as YouTube offer ways for Internet users to share situations they may have encountered during the congress. Preventing Chinese citizens from having access to them forces them to rely on the national media for their information."
The Google spokesman did not respond to a request for comment on reasons why access to Google.cn was disrupted.
"We've had numerous reports that Google.cn and other search engines were inaccessible in China yesterday and traffic redirected to other sites," the spokesman said in an emailed statement. "While this was clearly unfortunate, we are pleased that service has been restored to our users."
According to various media reports, local access to Chinese search engines owned by Google rivals such as Microsoft Corp. (MSFT:Microsoft Corporation
News, chart, profile, more
Last: 30.17-0.99-3.18%


4:00pm 10/19/2007


Delayed quote dataAdd to portfolio
Analyst
Create alertInsider
Discuss
Financials
Sponsored by:
MSFT 30.17, -0.99, -3.2%) was also disrupted.
A Microsoft spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The Reporters Without Borders report notes that while blogs and posted videos may contain diverse takes on the congress, mainstream press coverage of the event has been "virtually" uniform.
Reporters Without Borders a Paris-based organization that advocates for freedom of the press and the safety of journalis




Technorati : , , , ,

Life in a warmer world V safe & comfortable world


Global warming is warning the globe, solution is researched everyday for a safe comfortable world


THE AWARD of a Nobel Peace Prize last week to former United States Vice-President Al Gore, an honour he shares with the United Nations Inter-Governmental Panel On Climate Change, gives added interest to the problem of global warming.


In the words of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, the recipients were awarded for their "efforts to build up and disseminate greater knowledge about man-made climate change, and to lay the foundations for the measures that are needed to counteract such change".


Our own Dr Leonard Nurse, a lecturer in coastal management at the Cave Hill Campus of the University of the West Indies, was a member of that UN panel which also included Trinidadian life sciences lecturer, Dr John Agard, and Jamaica's retired physics professor, Dr Anthony Chen.


More than 170 countries have ratified the Kyoto Treaty which was crafted in Japan ten years ago, and commits industrialised nations to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases, chiefly carbon dioxide, by about 5.2 per cent below their 1990 levels.


No Caribbean country is in the league of those that contribute significantly to such an extent of pollution; but all can be affected by it.


Just three days ago the Caribbean Community Climate Change Centre reported on climate change on our shores, that were consistent with those reported elsewhere. These include rising sea levels caused by global warming that can negatively affect most countries in this region. In fact, much more so than on the larger continental land masses. The report echoes concern in the wider scientific community for the fate of small island states around the world.


It is largely irrelevant that these tiny countries contribute only minimally to global warming. Any significant lessening of the problem requires international commitment and effort, which is why so many have endorsed Kyoto, and why a large number are disappointed that the United States - whose industrial system belches out more carbon dioxide than any other - and Australia, have not adopted the protocol.


It is well-known that vegetation, especially large areas of trees, make a positive difference to air quality.


This is what inspires a growing number of environmentalists, including Greenpeace, to mobilise against projects that require destruction of rain forests whether to make way either for housing or for planting cash crops.


There is evidence that elevated temperatures are already melting the polar ice caps at an unprecedented rate and that distinct changes are occurring in weather patterns.


Even though Gore has many detractors, he is using his stature as a former United States vice-president to generate greater awareness of the phenomenon of global warming, and to promote a worldwide campaign aimed at sensitising governments and populations about potential peril arising from man-made environmental pollution.


Whatever the merits or otherwise of that activism, Caribbean people would do well to focus on ways in which they can help to tackle the problem. No single effort will ensure progress. It is the cumulative effect of all initiatives across the globe that matters.


Even so, some phenomena are outside the realm of human capability to prevent. Take tropical storms, for example. The Atlantic hurricane season isn't over yet. There are 40 days left, enough time for a likely catastrophic climatic event.


Admittedly, some of the data about rising global temperatures is disputed by Professor William Gray, a pioneer in the science of forecasting hurricanes and head of Colorado State University's Tropical Meteorological Project. Indeed, the scientific community is divided as to the causes or the degree of the influence of such causes on climate change. But global warming remains a major issue.


The use and price of oil must be a key factor. That energy source contributes massively to the worrying scale of emissions into the atmosphere, but technology has not yet reached a stage where "going green" can significantly diminish the world's heavy reliance on oil, although prices for the commodity are going through the roof.


It is clear that weather patterns around the world have changed. They may also be changing in Barbados. It is in our interest to do what little we can to reduce or eliminate reliance on any factors that might exacerbate that change.




Technorati :

technorati

Technorati Profile

Early humans knew their way around makeup, tools and shellfish : Key Human Traits Tied to Shellfish Remains


Small stone blades and a reddish body pigment recently discovered in a cave near the southern tip of South Africa suggest that the use of symbolism and tools -- hallmarks of modern human behavior -- had already begun to develop 164,000 years ago, far earlier than previously believed, researchers report.


Arizona researchers also found in the cave the earliest evidence of seafood consumption. The earliest previous evidence of the consumption of shellfish was dated to 125,000 years ago, and the oldest stone tools, known as bladelets, were 70,000 years old.



Researchers know that modern humans evolved in Africa between 100,000 and 200,000 years ago, but there has been little archeological evidence available to pin down a timeline.


Evidence along the coastlines has been particularly scarce because rising ocean waters after the end of the last glacial period obliterated most sites.


The new evidence comes from a cave at Pinnacle Point on Mossel Bay, about halfway between Cape Town and Port Elizabeth. The cave would have been two to three miles inland at the time it was occupied, high enough above sea level to be safe from flooding.


A team headed by anthropologist Curtis Marean of Arizona State University's Institute of Human Origins reported Thursday in the journal Nature that it found shells from cooked seafood in the cave, including brown and black mussels, small saltwater clams, sea snails and even a barnacle, which is typically found on whale blubber or skin.


Seafood was the last item added to the diet of humans before they began to domesticate animals and grow their own food. Marean said the ancient humans brought the shellfish to the cave and cooked it over hot rocks, which caused it to pop open. When Marean's team replicated the process, they found the food tasty but a little dry, he said.


The small bladelets, about the size of a pinky finger, are thought to have been attached to spears, often in multiples, providing an advantage over hand-held tools.


The red ocher pigment, found in the form of 57 lumps of hematite collected by the cave dwellers, would have been used for decorating their bodies and coloring artifacts. Such decoration is thought to be an early manifestation of symbolism. The decoration was used to convey messages to other peoples living in the vicinity.


Africa was cold and very dry during this period, and Marean and his colleagues speculated that the shellfish were a kind of "starvation food" the early humans turned to when there was little else available.


Evidence indicates there were only a handful of places in Africa where humans could have survived during this glacial period. Mossel Bay may have been one of them, they said.


"It is possible that this population could be the progenitor population for all modern humans," they wrote.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key Human Traits Tied to Shellfish Remains
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Almost from the start, it seems, humans headed for the shore. But this was no holiday for them. More than likely, it was a matter of survival at a perilous time of climate change in Africa 164,000 years ago.



By then Homo sapiens had developed a taste for shellfish - much earlier than previously thought, scientists report in today's issue of the journal Nature - as the species was adapting to life in caves on the craggy coast of southern Africa.


Exploring a cave in a steep cliff overlooking the ocean, an international team of scientists found deposits of shellfish remains, hearths, small stone blades and fragments of hematite, some of which, the scientists believe, had been ground for use as the coloring agent red ochre that sometimes had symbolic meaning.


"The shellfish," the researchers concluded, "may have been crucial to the survival of these early humans as they expanded their home ranges" in response to the cooler and drier conditions that had prevailed for thousands of years in the interior of Africa.


Curtis W. Marean, the team leader and a paleoanthropologist with the Institute of Human Origins at Arizona State University, said, "Shellfish was one of the last additions to the human diet before domesticated plants and animals were introduced," more than 10,000 years ago.


In an accompanying article, Sally McBrearty of the University of Connecticut and Chris Stringer of the Natural History Museum in London, who were not involved in the research, said the find provided "strong evidence that early humans displayed key elements of modern behavior" as early as 164,000 years ago.


The discovery was made in a cave at Pinnacle Point near Mossel Bay on the southern coast of South Africa, about 200 miles east of Cape Town.


Previous research had indicated that human ancestors had for ages depended solely on terrestrial plants and animals. Both fossil and genetic data show that modern humans evolved 150,000 to 200,000 years ago, but archaeological evidence for the emergence of modern behavior in technology, creativity, symbolic thinking and lifestyles is sparse.


But six years ago, at Blombos Cave, near Pinnacle Point, archaeologists uncovered 77,000-year-old tools along with pigments and engraved stones suggesting symbolic behavior, a sign of early creativity. Now, at the Pinnacle Point cave site, the shellfish remains reveal another important innovation.


Other coastal populations had been found exploiting marine resources as early as 125,000 years ago. Neanderthals were cooking shellfish in Italy about 110,000 years ago.


The presence of red ochre at Pinnacle Point, Dr. Marean's team also reported, indicated that at this time humans already "inhabited a cognitive world enriched by symbols." The researchers said the material had both symbolic and utilitarian functions and was probably used for body painting and for coloring artifacts.


Until recently, anthropologists generally assumed that modern human behavior arose much more recently, probably around 45,000 years ago, as a consequence of some unidentified change in brain function that favored communication and symbolic thinking to express social status and group identity. This interpretation was based on the apparently sudden appearance of art and self-adornment at sites in Europe.


The search for early human use of marine resources, supported by the National Science Foundation, centered on the cave at Pinnacle Point because of its position high on a cliff. Other seashore sites of early human occupation had been inundated by the rise in sea level, beginning about 115,000 years ago at the end of Africa's long arid conditions.


Forced to seek new sources of food, some of the people migrated to the shore in search of "famine food." At Pinnacle Point, the discovery team reported, they feasted on a variety of marine life, brown mussels, giant periwinkles and whelks.


So on the southern shore of Africa, Dr. Marean said in a statement issued by Arizona State, a small population of cave-dwelling modern humans struggled and survived through the prevailing cold, eating shellfish and developing somewhat advanced technologies.


"It is possible," he concluded, "that this population could be the progenitor population for all modern humans."






Technorati :

Google Gets Undue Credit for Ad Conversions :CORRECTED-AQuantive exec leads Microsoft charge into Web ads


Google undeservedly receives credit for many clicks on the online ads it delivers via its search engine, but Microsoft wants to put a stop to that.Google Inc. has gotten undeservedly all the credit for many clicks on the online ads it delivers via its search engine, but Microsoft Corp. wants to put a stop to that.


So said Brian McAndrews, senior vice president of Microsoft's Advertiser Publisher Solutions Group during a panel discussion at the Web 2.0 Summit in San Francisco Thursday.


Currently, systems for tracking ad conversions and analyzing online marketing campaigns focus on the last ad a user viewed or clicked on, he said. This gives all credit to that last publisher and not to others the user may have been at before and influenced the user to seek more information about the advertiser, McAndrews said.


In particular, this situation has unfairly benefitted Google because many times someone will see a display ad on a site and go to Google, search for the vendor's name, and then click on the vendor's text ad served by Google, he said.


But Microsoft is developing a technology called "conversion attribution" that will track the trail of ads seen by a user, so that advertisers get a more complete understanding of how effective their marketing campaigns, he said.


Along the way, advertisers will get a more balanced view of the value of their ads across a wider trail of Web sites and via a variety of ad formats, not just the last ad displayed by the last publisher, which is often Google, he said.


"We'll introduce conversion attribution to give [more publishers] credit and it will devalue search [advertising]," McAndrews said.


Search advertising is the largest online ad format, accounting for about 40 percent of total ad spend. Google has built its empire on these pay-per-click ads, which the company matches to the content of queries on its search engine and to the content of third-party Web sites on its ad network.


While search has been the main driver of the blistering growth of online advertising in the past five years, that won't be the case in the coming five years, McAndrews said.


In addition to the "conversion attribution" technology, the shift away from search ads will be fueled by the increased spending in online ads from large companies which prefer display and rich media advertising designed to boost their brands, and for which pay-per-click text ads are less effective, he said.


Google didn't have any representatives participating in the panel. The company didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.


Microsoft didn't immediately respond to a request for clarification on the availability of the "conversion attribution" technology.


McAndrews, who came to Microsoft recently via its US$6 billion of aQuantive Inc., of which he was the CEO, shared the stage with other ad executives in a panel titled "Edge: The Advertising Model" moderated by conference chair John Battelle.




CORRECTED-AQuantive exec leads Microsoft charge into Web ads




SAN FRANCISCO, Oct 19 (Reuters) - Microsoft Corp (MSFT.O: Quote, Profile, Research) said its $6 billion acquisition of aQuantive will fill out its Internet advertising technology and make it as competitive as Google Inc (GOOG.O: Quote, Profile, Research) in that market.


The August purchase of the digital advertising firm positions Microsoft as one of the few companies with the money and technology know-how to be a major force in an industry expected to grow to $80 billion by 2010, said Brian McAndrews, former aQuantive CEO who is leading Microsoft's advertising efforts.



"Our goal is to have a significant amount of the revenue in the industry going through our technology, our platform," said McAndrews, who spoke to Reuters this week on the sidelines of the Web 2.0 Summit in San Francisco. "All parts of our business will be bigger and more profitable."


AQuantive's Atlas technology allows advertisers and publishers to buy and sell digital advertisements.


Microsoft still needs to be able to sell "contextual" advertising to target specific visitors of a Web site, but McAndrews expects that it can introduce that capability next year, providing a full suite of advertising tools.


McAndrews is at the vortex of Microsoft's major push into Web advertising technology. Threatened by Google, the company is working to build a major business to be a pillar of earnings alongside its main Windows and Office software. Microsoft made its biggest-ever acquisition when it bought aQuantive and handed the keys to its advertising business to McAndrews. The executive ranked No. 11 in Business 2.0 magazine's "50 Who Matter Now," ahead of even his Microsoft bosses, who include CEO Steve Ballmer and Chairman Bill Gates.



'1 + 1 = 3'


McAndrews, who is senior vice president at Microsoft's advertiser and publisher services group, said the benefits of the acquisition would increase over time.



"Absolutely, one plus one equals three, but not on day one," he said. "I would say something like one plus one equals two and a quarter."


Microsoft's acquisition of aQuantive is part of a $10 billion consolidation spree in the online advertising market, centered mostly around deep-pocketed players. Google agreed to pay $3.1 billion for DoubleClick, while Yahoo Inc (YHOO.O: Quote, Profile, Research) snatched up the rest of Right Media for $680 million.


"There just aren't going to be very many companies that can invest the kind of money it's going to take to build these platforms and have the technology expertise," said McAndrews.


For now, AQuantive's Avenue A/Razorfish interactive ad agency will remain in Microsoft. Wall Street analysts had earlier speculated the lower-margin unit, which accounts for nearly 60 percent of aQuantive's revenue, may be sold


McAndrews explained that Avenue A had also been a key link between its advertiser clients and the part of aQuantive that specializes in ad-serving and tracking technologies. AQuantive has also profited from its technology ties with traditional ad agencies.


"Agencies are a critical part of the ecosystem," McAndrews said. "They aren't going away, they shouldn't go away and, frankly, if there is a technology company trying to disintermediate them, then I think that's a mistake."


Google has sought to extend its auction-based technology for efficiently selling Web search advertising to traditional media, from television to radio and print. While the company said it did not plan to replicate the ad agency model, many in the industry fear it might eventually offer a wider range of advertising services, including creating campaigns.








Technorati : ,

In Search of Wireless Wiggle Room



By Judith Chevalier (Judith Chevalier is a professor of economics and finance at the Yale School of Management.)


I RECENTLY watched a YouTube clip of a young man removing the memory chip from his iPhone with his teeth, in an attempt to "unlock" the device for use on a network other than the AT&T system for which the phone was exclusively sold. His gyrations were a particularly vivid reminder of the limits imposed on cellphones by the companies that run national wireless networks in the United States



But there are signs that the existing order in the wireless world may finally be changing.


This month, despite the opposition of companies like Verizon, the Federal Communications Commission reiterated that its coming auction of wireless spectrum would include rules intended to give consumers more choices in the phones they can use. These "open access" auction rules have already received considerable attention, but the commission also faces other decisions that will significantly affect the availability and the price of wireless service.


For decades, the F.C.C. has allocated almost all the prime frequencies available for communication for the exclusive use of licensees and since the 1990s, it has emphasized auctions for allocating that spectrum. Economists mostly applauded the move to the auction system, because it subjected prospective licenses to a market test: the F.C.C. no longer had to try to divine who would make the most productive use of the spectrum; the companies that were willing to pay the most at auction would win.


Not all of the spectrum is auctioned, however. Some of it is left "unlicensed" - meaning that no one has exclusive rights to it. Baby monitors, garage door openers and Wi-Fi all work on unlicensed parts of the spectrum, in a kind of free-for-all. As technology improves to prevent these devices from stumbling over one another's signals, the argument for leaving part of the spectrum unlicensed grows stronger as well.


In the past, when the F.C.C. auctioned spectrum for cellular service, it allowed the winners to determine the equipment and applications that would run on their networks. That created the current status quo, in which a vast majority of American consumers buy a handset from a wireless service provider.


The open-access rules, which will apply to about one-third of the spectrum being sold at the auction, represent a significant departure from past practice. They require the winners to let consumers use any tested, safe and compatible device or application on its network. Entrepreneurs could sell handsets with capabilities that are unavailable - or unavailable at affordable prices - from current carriers. As long as a manufacturer offered a product compatible with a network, the consumer could use that product - without needing to take measures like unlocking it with his teeth.


The spectrum in the coming auction is low frequency, which means that a signal using it could travel long distances and penetrate walls, making it very appealing for a national wireless network. Because the signal travels well, for example, fewer towers would be needed. Thus, it is possible that a new network could emerge from the auction to compete with the four existing national carriers.


Although the open-access rules could lead to innovation in devices and applications, they might not do much to increase competition among carriers. Preventing an influx of additional competition would be valuable for the big existing carriers, so they may bid aggressively enough that no new carriers will win significant licenses at the auction.


Both Google and Frontline Wireless - a start-up whose vice chairman is Reed E. Hundt, a former F.C.C. chairman - lobbied the commission to effectively force new entry into the market by imposing added restrictions on auction winners. They argued that winners should be forced to resell use of the spectrum at wholesale rates, a provision the F.C.C. did not adopt. The idea was that this spectrum could support multiple services, creating competition and driving down prices.


Having missed the opportunity to include these provisions in the coming auction, the F.C.C. will have another chance this year to create cheaper wireless broadband services. Google and other technology companies, including Dell, Philips and Microsoft, are part of a group called the White Space Coalition that is asking the F.C.C. to open up the empty space between assigned TV channels to unlicensed users and devices.


The idea would work like this: In many areas, not all broadcast channels are in use. The unused channels are "white spaces" of high-quality spectrum that could be made available to local Internet service providers. Unlike the much higher frequency of Wi-Fi, television broadcast frequencies can travel for miles and penetrate walls, providing a much broader range for Internet service. Because the unused channels vary across the country, the group proposes that consumers be able to buy generic devices, like PC cards for Wi-Fi, that would search for open frequencies and connect to a service.


Big cities tend to have many TV stations. That means there would be more white-space opportunity in rural areas, which also tend to be underserved by wired broadband services. If the plan worked, rural America could be dotted with high-speed wireless Internet service providers - like having a Starbucks on every corner, minus the coffee.


The catch? Television broadcasters argue that these services would interfere with digital television reception. The National Association of Broadcasters has run TV spots depicting doomsday - an increasingly irritated woman banging on her TV because, "if Microsoft and other high-tech companies have their way, your TV could freeze up and become unwatchable."


Interference with broadcast television wouldn't affect the more than 80 percent of television-viewing households who don't watch over-the-air TV anyway. And it wouldn't be a problem if the white-space gadgets work as intended, avoiding frequencies where there is any conflict. Unfortunately, that is not a given: a Microsoft device failed F.C.C. engineering tests earlier this year.


The F.C.C. has shown some bravery in maintaining the open-access auction rules, despite efforts to dismantle them. Now the commission needs to deal with the arguments of the broadcasters.


While there is certainly a risk that white-space Internet devices could interfere with some television signals, the potential for cheap, accessible wireless broadband is too great to pass up.


Judith Chevalier is a professor of economics and finance at the Yale School of Management.





Technorati :

Orionid Meteor Shower Peaks Sunday Morning : Meteod watching tips


The annual Orionid meteor shower peaks early Sunday morning and could put on a delightful display for skywatchers with clear, dark skies.

The Orionids are created by tiny bits of debris thought to be left in space by Halley's Comet as it orbits the sun. Each year, Earth passes through the debris trail, and the material lights up as it vaporizes in our atmosphere, creating "shooting stars."
In the countryside away from light pollution, the Orionids typically serve up around 20 meteors per hour during the peak. This year could be double that, said Joe Rao, SPACE.com's Skywatching Columnist. The estimate is based on a tentative new prediction from Mikaya Sato and Jun-ichi Watanabe of Japan's National Astronomical Observatory. However, meteor shower predictions are notoriously difficult, experts agree.
Either way, cloudless skies and dark conditions away from streetlights and house lights would make for an enjoyable show anytime between 1:30 a.m. and daybreak Sunday, Rao figures.
"Almost certainly, you should sight at least a few of these offspring of Halley's Comet as they streak across the sky," he said.
Urban skywatchers would see far fewer meteors.
The meteors can appear anywhere in the sky, but will all seem to emanate from a single point, called the radiant. The radiant for the Orionids, in the constellation Orion, will be high in the southern sky in the predawn hours.
Meteor watching is best done from a location with a broad view of the sky. A blanket or lounge chair allows the skywatcher to comfortably lie back and look up. Seasoned observers advise wearing much warmer clothing than you think you might need. Telescopes and binoculars are not needed.
The Orionid shower is already under way and ramping up, producing a handful of meteors each hour after midnight. So, the mornings immediately surrounding the peak could be worth a look too, Rao said.
Source :




Meteor Watching 101: Tips and terms



> The part of Earth where dawn is breaking is always at the leading edge of our planet's plunge along its orbital path around the Sun. This part of the planet tends to "catch" oncoming meteors left by a comet, whereas the other side of Earth, where it is dusk or late evening, outruns the debris. For that reason, the hours between midnight and dawn are typically the best time to watch a meteor shower.

> Allow time for your eyes to adjust to darkness. A good hour is smart, so that you can also practice some prior to prime observing time.


> Dress warmer than you think you need to, especially in winter.


> Bring a lounge chair or blanket, so you can relax and look up with ease.


> During meteor showers, shooting stars appear to emanate from a point in the sky called the radiant. There are different ideas about how to use this fact to aid in spotting meteors. Robert Lunsford has these thoughts:


One idea is that it is preferable to look away from the radiant so that the shower meteors you see will be longer and therefore easy to detect motion. As Mark Davis stated one should look 20-40 degrees distant. At this distance the radiant is still in your field of view so that shower association is still fairly easy.


Those who look directly at the radiant can see shower activity travel in any direction. Shower association will be fairly obvious. Meteors that appear near the radiant will be foreshortened and therefore the motion will be more difficult to detect.




Technorati :

Countdown :NASA Watches Weather for Tuesday Shuttle


CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. - NASA's countdown for the launching of the shuttle Discovery on a pivotal assembly mission to the international space station got under way this afternoon, with a weather outlook that was only slightly favorable.


NASA is watching the weather for Tuesday's planned launch of the space shuttle Discovery.


Rain showers and thick clouds are the chief hurdles facing Discovery's upcoming space shot, with current forecasts predicting a 60 percent chance of favorable launch conditions. The clock began counting down to the shuttle's planned launch at 2:00 p.m. EDT (1800 GMT) today.


"We have several concerns for launch day," said NASA shuttle weather officer Kathy Winters in a mission update here at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC).


Winters said a frontal boundary of weather will bring rain showers over Discovery's launch site today and throughout early next week, but should steer clear by Tuesday. Only remaining rain showers and thick clouds may post a threat to Discovery's launch, she added.


Commanded by veteran shuttle astronaut Pamela Melroy, Discovery's seven-astronaut crew is set to launch on Oct. 23 at 11:38 a.m. EDT (1538 GMT) to begin a 14-day construction flight to the International Space Station (ISS). Discovery will deliver the vital connecting node Harmony and ferry a new crewmember to the station as part of NASA's STS-120 mission.


"We are tracking no issues in our preparations at this point," NASA test director Charlie Blackwell-Thompson told reporters.


Shuttle workers are expected to begin loading the super-cold liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen used to power Discovery's three fuel cells at 10:00 a.m. EDT (1400 GMT) on Sunday, but could delay the operation should poor weather intervene, said Blackwell-Thompson, adding that there is plenty of time to make up any delayed work in time for Tuesday's launch.


NASA has until Dec. 11 to launch Discovery's STS-120 mission, but plans to make up to four attempts within five days, beginning with the Oct. 23 opportunity. Should weather prevent Tuesday's planned launch, the weather outlook remains the same - 60 percent chance of favorable launch conditions - for Wednesday and Thursday, Winters said.


Meanwhile, the 31,400-pound Harmony connecting node and a trio of spare space station parts are stowed inside Discovery payload bay and ready for their trip to the ISS. With its multiple attachment points, Harmony will serve as a hub for future international laboratories to be launched to the space station. The first new laboratory - the European Space Agency's Columbus module - is slated to launch aboard the shuttle Atlantis on Dec. 6.


"We are ready to go," said NASA's STS-120 payload manager Glen Chin.





Technorati :

Orionid Meteor Shower Peaks Sunday Morning Meteod watching tips


The annual Orionid meteor shower peaks early Sunday morning and could put on a delightful display for skywatchers with clear, dark skies.

The Orionids are created by tiny bits of debris thought to be left in space by Halley's Comet as it orbits the sun. Each year, Earth passes through the debris trail, and the material lights up as it vaporizes in our atmosphere, creating "shooting stars."
In the countryside away from light pollution, the Orionids typically serve up around 20 meteors per hour during the peak. This year could be double that, said Joe Rao, SPACE.com's Skywatching Columnist. The estimate is based on a tentative new prediction from Mikaya Sato and Jun-ichi Watanabe of Japan's National Astronomical Observatory. However, meteor shower predictions are notoriously difficult, experts agree.
Either way, cloudless skies and dark conditions away from streetlights and house lights would make for an enjoyable show anytime between 1:30 a.m. and daybreak Sunday, Rao figures.
"Almost certainly, you should sight at least a few of these offspring of Halley's Comet as they streak across the sky," he said.
Urban skywatchers would see far fewer meteors.
The meteors can appear anywhere in the sky, but will all seem to emanate from a single point, called the radiant. The radiant for the Orionids, in the constellation Orion, will be high in the southern sky in the predawn hours.
Meteor watching is best done from a location with a broad view of the sky. A blanket or lounge chair allows the skywatcher to comfortably lie back and look up. Seasoned observers advise wearing much warmer clothing than you think you might need. Telescopes and binoculars are not needed.
The Orionid shower is already under way and ramping up, producing a handful of meteors each hour after midnight. So, the mornings immediately surrounding the peak could be worth a look too, Rao said.
Source :




Meteor Watching 101: Tips and terms



> The part of Earth where dawn is breaking is always at the leading edge of our planet's plunge along its orbital path around the Sun. This part of the planet tends to "catch" oncoming meteors left by a comet, whereas the other side of Earth, where it is dusk or late evening, outruns the debris. For that reason, the hours between midnight and dawn are typically the best time to watch a meteor shower.

> Allow time for your eyes to adjust to darkness. A good hour is smart, so that you can also practice some prior to prime observing time.


> Dress warmer than you think you need to, especially in winter.


> Bring a lounge chair or blanket, so you can relax and look up with ease.


> During meteor showers, shooting stars appear to emanate from a point in the sky called the radiant. There are different ideas about how to use this fact to aid in spotting meteors. Robert Lunsford has these thoughts:


One idea is that it is preferable to look away from the radiant so that the shower meteors you see will be longer and therefore easy to detect motion. As Mark Davis stated one should look 20-40 degrees distant. At this distance the radiant is still in your field of view so that shower association is still fairly easy.


Those who look directly at the radiant can see shower activity travel in any direction. Shower association will be fairly obvious. Meteors that appear near the radiant will be foreshortened and therefore the motion will be more difficult to detect.




Technorati :

Climate change blamed for fading foliage : observation



For ovservation of climate change ,


Every fall, Marilyn Krom tries to make a trip to Vermont to see its famously beautiful fall foliage.



This year, she noticed something different about the autumn leaves.


"They're duller, not as sparkly, if you know what I mean," Krom, 62, a registered nurse from Eastford, Conn., said during a recent visit. "They're less vivid."


Other "leaf peepers" are noticing, too, and some believe climate change could be the reason.


Forested hillsides usually riotous with reds, oranges and yellows have shown their colors only grudgingly in recent years, with many trees going straight from the dull green of late summer to the rust-brown of late fall with barely a stop at a brighter hue.


"It's nothing like it used to be," said University of Vermont plant biologist Tom Vogelmann, a Vermont native.


He says autumn has become too warm to elicit New England's richest colors.


According to the National Weather Service, temperatures in Burlington have run above the 30-year averages in every September and October for the past four years, save for October 2004, when they were 0.2 degrees below average.


Warming climate affects trees in several ways.


Colors emerge on leaves in the fall, when the green chlorophyll that has dominated all spring and summer breaks down.


The process begins when shorter days signal leaves to form a layer at the base of their stems that cuts off the flow of water and nutrients. But in order to hasten the decline of chlorophyll, cold nights are needed.


In addition, warmer autumns and winters have been friendly to fungi that attack some trees, particularly the red and sugar maples that provide the most dazzling colors.


"The leaves fall off without ever becoming orange or yellow or red. They just go from green to brown," said Barry Rock, a forestry professor at the University of New Hampshire.


He says 2004 was "mediocre, 2005 was terrible, 2006 was pretty bad although it was spotty. This year, we're seeing that same spottiness."


"Leaf peeping" is big business in Vermont, with some 3.4 million visitors spending nearly $364 million in the fall of 2005, according to state estimates.


State tourism officials reject the notion that nature's palette is getting blander. Erica Housekeeper, spokeswoman for the state Department of Tourism and Marketing, said she had heard nothing but positive reports from foresters and visitors alike this year.


The problem is perception, Housekeeper says: Recollections of autumns past become tinged by nostalgia.


"Sometimes, we become our own worst critics," Housekeeper said.


People who rely on autumn tourism in New England are worried.


"I don't have a sense that the colors are off, but the timing is definitely off," said Scott Cowger, owner and innkeeper at the Maple Hill Farm Bed & Breakfast Inn at Hallowell, Maine.


"Some trees are just starting to change now," Cowger said Thursday. "It used to be, religiously, it was the second week of October when they were at their peak. I would tell my guests to come the second week if you want to see the peak colors. But it's definitely the third or fourth week at this point."


People in Northampton, Mass., are still waiting on fall color. If foliage-viewing is the goal, "I wouldn't send anybody down this way yet," Autumn Inn desk clerk Mary Pelis said this past week.


"The way things are going, the foliage season is the one sure thing for us," said Amie Emmons, innkeeper at the West Mountain Inn, in Arlington, Vt. "We book out two years in advance. It's very concerning if you think the business could start to be affected




Technorati :

Find here

Home II Large Hadron Cillider News